When Americans want to site a medical authority, we tend to think of domestic bodies such as the American Medical Association (AMA), the Center for Disease Control (CDC), or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These national health and medicine entities are rife with problems. They have been caught fudging research results and backing products for untoward reasons many times. A great example is the cover-up of the vaccine courts, where millions of dollars have been paid out to the victims of vaccinations, yet there is a chance the reader is learning about it for the first time this very moment.
But we tend to ignore the WHO. They might offer a broader perspective when their information is considered along with bodies that are more familiar to us if they are to be trusted.
The problem with the WHO is that their methods are much less transparent to US citizens than our own government-funded health agencies. They have ties to the European Union, (EU), the World Bank, and other organizations which arguably do not have American interests at heart.
Even if we do not trust the CDC, FDA, and AMA at least they count on the United States for a place to live.
So, it is a concern when the WHO comes out with information that it seems we should pay attention to.
Concerns over a possible global pandemic resurfaced after the recent worldwide flu outbreak. Last winter’s flu epidemic was global in scope and the pathogen caused much more acute symptoms than what is normally associated with the flu. Thousands of people died globally, but France, England, Australia, and the United States were hit the hardest.
In 2016, the Zika virus, which we are told comes from mosquitoes, took a heavy toll on over 70 countries causing birth defects in infants. Its effects were especially pronounced in South America, which features a tropical climate that mosquitoes find particularly amenable.
In 2014 and 2015, the hemorrhagic fever Ebola killed over 10,000 in Africa alone. The WHO declared an end to the Ebola threat in 2016. Ebola, we are told, most likely came from a boy who was playing in a hollow tree which was inhabited by infected bats.
The Ebola virus affected tens of thousands of people and killed 40% of those who contracted it.
Dr. Tedros said, “This is not some future nightmare scenario. A devastating epidemic could start in any country at any time and kill millions of people because we are still not prepared. The world remains vulnerable. We do not know where and when the next global pandemic will occur, but we know it will take a terrible toll both on human life and on the economy.”
While this is frightening, it does not shed light on any specific or meaningful vulnerability that we should address. We know, for example, that overuse of antibiotics in our food and medicine make us more vulnerable to infection. But Tedros does not mention this, nor does he mention any solutions.
Mike Adams, the publisher of Medicine.news, says, “Hidden underneath this fear-mongering message of a global pandemic is a far more sinister WHO agenda. The real agenda is a global push for blind, fear-based acceptance of unsafe, unproven vaccines that will be rolled out alongside the next global pandemic. Fear circumvents rational thinking, which is why the vaccine-pharma cartels routinely turn to irrational fear propaganda to demand absolute and unquestioning acceptance of risky medical interventions that should always be scrutinized for safety and efficacy.”
Like the United Nations, and the World Bank the WHO has a clear interest in expanding and deepening its authority as the world’s foremost health authority. By sewing fear in this way, it does not take a great leap of the imagination to foresee the mandatory administration of vaccinations and other medical treatments being rolled out all over the world.
Throughout history, we have seen fear used again and again by governments and NGO’s as an attempt to obtain legal permission to enforce their wishes at the barrel of a police officer’s gun.
If a global pandemic is declared, whatever intervention the WHO prescribes could be administered by force. There would be no respect for national borders as medical police are invited in and people are forcibly given drugs that- if recent history is to be our guide- contain secret ingredients and were subjected to rigged studies.
~ Health Scams Exposed