Fauci Attempted to Shut Down Op-Ed That Criticized the Government’s C*VID-1984 Response

Throughout the covid-19 pandemic, Americans have had the unfortunate luck of having Dr. Anthony Fauci as the country’s “expert.”

Undoubtedly, Fauci has decades of experience and as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), he wields a lot of power and influence over whatever direction the country takes in response to a pandemic.

What would be nice, however, is if Fauci could make up his mind about protocols around covid. He has done nothing but flip flop since the very beginning and yet more evidence has emerged, confirming this.

A recently revealed leaked email, showed that Fauci had flagged an article last year, that denounced social distancing measures, put in place to allegedly curb the spread of covid.

The article in question, was an op-ed by Dr. Vinay Prasad of the University of California and political science professor Vladimir Kroger of Ohio State University. 

Published in STAT News – the op-ed argued that it is politics, not science, that was behind the motivation to delay the reopening of schools and implementing social distancing once they did reopen.

Fauci’s chief of staff, Greg Folkers at the NIAID, informed Fauci of the op-ed and this caused Fauci to contact Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

“You probably have already seen this. But just in case, you should be aware of it,” wrote Fauci.

Fauci highlighted several paragraphs of the price, one section stating: “Schools should decide whether to open based on community transmission and students should strive to be spaced six feet apart aren’t supported by science.”

“These two demands will keep schools closed much longer than necessary, harming kids,” Prasad and Kogan wrote.

They went on to question the color-coded system put in place by the CDC, which determined what schools could open fully or remain closed. The pair noted that the “red” category set by the CDC, is characterized by having more than 100 covid cases per 100,000 people per week.

“By this metric, more than 90 percent of the country is currently in the most restrictive tier – ruling out full-time, in-person learning for elementary-aged students and any sort of in-person school for older children without screening tests. Yet many schools in such communities already have in-person schools, and have done so for months, without issue.”

The op-ed authors pointed out that new research and evidence argues against the 6 foot social distancing rules and that the CDC guidance is based on “decades-old research.”

“First, it is increasingly clear that transmission of COVID-19 is not explained by the droplet mode – the idea that bigger drops of secretion fall in the first few feet around someone. Second, a meta-analysis on COVID-19 and other closely related coronaviruses showed that the benefits of increasing the distance from three to six feet is marginal in contexts where the risk of infection is low, as would be the case in a classroom with universal masking.”

Kroger and Prasad also added that social distancing guidelines from the CDC “will work to provide cover for interest groups and districts that want to delay in-person learning.”

The Brooking Institute, which holds strong liberal views, was forced to admit that partisan politics and teachers unions played a huge role in whether or not schools reopened.

Prasad and Kroger concluded that the CDC only confused the situation instead of “moving the ball forward on [President Joe] Biden’s goal of getting elementary and middle schools reopened as soon as possible.”


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

2 thoughts on “Fauci Attempted to Shut Down Op-Ed That Criticized the Government’s C*VID-1984 Response

  1. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 Pandemic has never been about Science or Health or anything Medicinal as far as the USA has been concerned. COVID-19 was, and now it’s offspring variants are, simply manufactured crises that any good Democrat could not afford to let go to waste. Fear was created (and is maintained) as a means of eliminating Individual Rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. Power is the Golden Ring, and the Constitution stands in the way of grabbing that Ring of Power. An epidemic-turned-pandemic was only a means by which to achieve the elimination of the rights of the individual in order to allow the State to dictate its ideology and try to cement its control over a government meant to be for, of and by The People and for which a bloody and divisive War was fought in order that it should not perish from this earth.

    Dr Fauci was/is a tool, a pawn to be sacrificed, as needed, to protect the King. That he does not, cannot or will not see this is his true calamity.

  2. Unbelievable that a man of Fauci’s age can get so drunk on power and politics.
    Looking at him speak you can tell he is enjoying every minute of his given time on the screen. Covid is bad no doubt about it. So is the year in year out flu although it causes less deaths. Toll has been greatest amongst the aged The entire covid pandemic has been blown out of proportion.
    The ensuing result has been the enormous loss in livelihoods, collapse or near collapse of economies that were once thriving. The way in which we live our lives in a bad way, families and friends separated.
    I have also been informed that this man was cautioned against carrying out these tests called ‘gain of function’ research by his colleagues and that he effectively dealt with them to keep them silent.
    He should be made to pay for his crimes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *