If you care about the health of your family, your pets, and your self- as you almost certainly do- then you have a duty to take a close look at anything in your immediate environment that could cause harm. The average person chooses to trust the so-called experts. They put their faith in the conclusions of researchers whose funding comes from government and corporate sources.
All too often the people paying for a given piece of science, (think big tobacco and fluoride), have influence over the outcome of the research they are buying. Questioning the validity of the studies we are presented with is not anti-science. The first question one should ask when presented with a piece of research is, does the research team’s benefactor have a vested interest in a specific outcome.
In other words, if a study came out that said Coca-Cola is the new superfood, the first question you would ask is whether or not Coca-Cola funded the research team. If you found that they had, you would appraise the study accurately- and use it as toilet paper.
As it turns out, most of the most broadly publicized research on the “safety” of the new 5G networks are funded by the companies who stand to profit from the sale of these wireless tech devices. What we’re going to cover here, in brief, is a series of studies rendered and delivered by organizations that have no vested interest in the sale and dissemination of wireless tech.
The National Toxicology Program concluded years ago that radiation from cell phones and cell towers does increase the risk of cancer. This is in keeping with historical data which shows that anyplace where electricity of any kind is introduced, cancer rates rise at a commensurate pace. If people have this knowledge, they can use electrical devices- mobile tech included- and take appropriate safety precautions. But if we are told that it’s just plain safe- then we are naked to the harmful effects of wifi.
Wifiinschools.org.uk have produced more than 30 research projects that demonstrate harm done to children attending schools where wifi is used to feed data to laptops, tablets, and phones. In many cases, wifi is used to power desktops for which an ethernet cable would easily suffice. What the research shows is that the exposed children experience increased rates of allergies, immune disorders, and higher rates of cancer. Worse still perhaps is the destructive effect on the children’s reproductive organs- especially girls.
Interestingly, some of the best evidence of the harm of wireless signals can be found in the instruction manuals for wireless devices. Apple’s user manual for the 2016 iPhone tells users to keep cell phones away from the body at all times.
The Telegraph reported on a study showing that exposure to cell phone radiation was lowering fertility rates in men. The good news is that men can recover quickly since sperm replaces itself on a daily basis. But the effects on a woman’s egg supply could be much worse, the researchers warn.
Brain surgeon, Dr. Charlie Teo warned against the use of cell phones, mobiles, and wireless home devices. This warning came as the result of direct observation of the effects of wireless signals. Dr. Teo says the brains of persons who used cell phones by holding them up to their heads show visible signs of radiological injury. He notes that women suffer the most damage as they tend to use their phones more frequently and for longer periods of time than men.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has admonished us to limit the exposure time of children to wireless signals. Today’s adult did not grow up with these devices- yet the effects on adults are measurable. Many children born after the mid-90s, by contrast, have never been outside of the reach of wireless signals. The effects this will have on their long-term health are without comparison.
Over 60 international research bodies have disseminated warnings concerning wi-fi and microwave radiation (the same type, essentially).
All of the studies referenced so far were based on data related to standard wifi, that is 4G or lower. We have yet to see the effects of constant exposure of 5G, but they are not hard to predict. The important differences are that 5G uses a more intense type of radiation and that the rollout is intended to be absolutely pervasive.
The plan, we are told, is to put 5G on every street corner- for free. They want us literally bathed in it. Why do they want us to have so much free connectivity? No doubt because they care so very, very much.
~ Health Scams Exposed