Like politics, the issue of vaccinations in this country has become exceedingly divisive. People are coming down hard on both sides of the line- and both have good arguments. However, when it comes to debating the pros and cons of vaccinations, there is an important area of nuance that is being overlooked.
Now, let’s get one thing straight. More people on the anti-vaccination side really understand what it is that makes a vaccine dangerous- and what doesn’t. It is those who would vaccinate in every case- on faith- without questioning the methods, the schedule, or the contents of the vaccine itself who are allowing the problem to persist.
Vaccines have eliminated deadly diseases and can prevent deadly diseases from wiping out populations. They come with risks. But when they are properly formulated, scheduled, and delivered for use in preventing dangerous diseases, then what we are talking about is a shining accomplishment of the science and practice of medicine.
Over the last few decades, vaccines have been used to eradicate smallpox, polio, and numerous other diseases that were debilitating and deadly. People suffered immensely as their loved ones were tortured and killed by these dreadful conditions.
When the science of vaccination emerged and started saving lives at a dramatic rate- people, understandably, began to look on the drugs as a miracle that could do no harm. They forgot the risks, dismissed the price at which these treatments were used, and began to demand blanket usage of them in communities all across the country.
For the medical industry, force-feeding the public these drugs meant huge guaranteed profits. But the mass production meant that dangerous preservatives had to be used. Common preservatives used to stabilize vaccines on the shelf are aluminum and mercury.
These heavy metals are deadly, and when combined they become even more toxic- destroying nervous tissues throughout the body, and causing intestinal inflammation. When the intestines become inflamed, the digestive tract fails to sequester toxic substances away from the bloodstream. This is when the destructive effects of vaccines begin to rapidly emerge.
The tremendous enthusiasm for vaccines also drove people to give too much to children at too young an age. Today, small children are being pumped full of numerous vaccinations- many of which contain poisonous preservatives. And all too often, parents are encouraged to allow health care professionals to give as many vaccines in a single visit as possible. The result is a simple matter of causing an overdose.
All of the conditions that present a risk factor for vaccination are present and compounded in the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR). Lauded as an instant and permanent preventative for three dreaded maladies, the MMR shot is chock full of heavy metal preservatives and contains a triple threat of vaccines that should be given during separate visits. In nearly all cases it is given to infants and toddlers who are much too small and fragile to sustain the trauma of intaking three live viruses- plus mercury and aluminum.
So, many people who are being lambasted as anti-science Luddites are not against vaccines at all. They are against the use of vaccines that contain poison. They are against the use of excessive dosages, and they are against the use of harsh dosages in children who are too small and young to tolerate them. As usual, people with genuine and reasonable concerns are being called foul names and shamed in order to push an agenda that is not evidently a material good for society.
Those of us who question the use of vaccines do not want to ban or abandon these obviously valuable interventions. We want them administered correctly, not in an aggressive fashion. We want them to be free of poisons like mercury and aluminum. We want them spaced out over time so that the systems of patients can tolerate them. And we do not want them administered to infants who do not need them- and cannot safely consume them.
For thousands of years, people in poor communities in India have used a system of inoculation that works without any of the modern risks that we now face which are associated with the abusive practices of a vaccination obsessed medical establishment. They would use the scab tissue of patients who had contracted a given disease, like mumps, or chicken pox. These would be rubbed on the skin and then the skin would be pricked. The patient would become ill, recover, and then naturally develop immunity- and never did the use of poisons ever even remotely enter into the equation.
~ Health Scams Exposed
