Water Scarcity as a Weapon for Population Control

Global water consumption has doubled since the late 1960s, as has the human population. Today, an estimated 1.3 billion people have no access to clean drinking water. In the so-called first world, running water and relatively clean drinking water gives us longer lives comparatively free of disease and drought conditions which had afflicted humans for thousands of years. Each year, an estimated 2.2 million people worldwide die due to inadequate access to clean running water.

Without clean water, the body cannot operate properly. Proper washing is impossible without running water. Even small cuts and scratches can become dangerous if not washed. While medical science is credited with prolonging our lives by more than half- the truth is running water is our real savior. Indeed, running water cures and prevents more potentially deadly diseases and infections than any other factor. That is to say, your plumber is grossly under-compensated for the unglamorous work he does- with or without poorly fitted pants.

There is no medical intervention that can remedy this problem. Neither Doctors Without Borders, Bill Gates vaccination programs, or any other medical charity initiative can fix this problem. Only a reliable supply of clean water can remedy this global disparity.

Recall that several years back, the President and CEO of the Nestle corporation was quoted as saying that people do not have a right to clean water. This came out as California was struggling through one of its many droughts- which no Californian ever really feels the impact of.

Seventy percent of the world’s clean water supply is used to cultivate agriculture. That means, wherever there is a shortage of water- there will also be a shortage of food. While this looks like an unavoidable compounding of a serious problem to the average person- for multinational corporations, it sounds like an opportunity to turn a profit.

It’s a little-known fact that the Nestle corporation is permitted to extract water from natural, publicly owned water sources in the United States and then sell that water all over the world. Nestle and other major corporations take water from sources like the Great Lakes and sell it to populations all over the world.

In 2007, the U.N. declared that nations and local authorities all over the world must control water resources via a “water for profit” model. Since then, we have seen an escalating problem of law enforcement cracking down on people collecting rainwater- even on their own property.

In 2012, an Oregon man was sentenced to 30 days in jail and ordered to pay a $1,500 fine for collecting rainwater on his Eagle Point property.

Indeed, collecting rainwater is now illegal in 11 states.

Laws like these have been on the books for a long time. They stem from the misconception that collecting rainwater can result in a shortage for the rivers and stream that carry water to the majority of people in these areas. It’s an idea that should have fallen by the wayside. Still as recently as 2016, the water supply chief in Colorado, was quoted as saying, “Stream flow is supplied by precipitation in the form of rain and snow, so if the supply is taken away, stream flow will decrease.”

It’s difficult to imagine any rationale for prohibiting rainwater collection other than a motivation to deprive people of their natural right to rainwater. It makes more sense to put meters on people’s faces and tax them for the amount of air they convert into carbon dioxide- but we don’t want to give them any ideas!

While hysteria over the negative effects of human life on the planet escalates, people are increasingly indoctrinated to accept laws limiting their access to natural resources. An inevitable consequence of this kind of thinking is the notion of population control, an idea that has been around longer than the Green Party.

We refer you to the Georgia Guidestones. Erected in 1980, they say the following in 10 languages:

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature … resolving external disputes in a world court … Balance personal rights with social duties … Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.”

This sounds nice. But the result of balancing “personal rights with social duties” by force means totalitarian control on human beings.

In 1980 the global population was 4,439,632,464. So, what was their plan to get rid of four billion people? Could engineered water shortages have been a part of that plan?

~ Health Scams Exposed


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More